Teaching DO Students LGBT Health
In this May 1, 2014, article in The DO, the author outlines common concerns faced by LGBT
patients when accessing healthcare, including seeing a healthcare provider who
is not aware of or comfortable with LGBT-specific health issues. The article
notes the lack of LGBT health education providers receive. “There are too few
health professionals who are trained in LGBT healthcare. And you cannot rely on
physicians and medical students who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender
themselves to deliver all that care,” says Henry Ng, MD, MPH, clinical director
of LGBT health services at MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland and President
of GLMA. Sean Tai, DO student and recipient of the AMSA/GLMA Achievement Award,
notes that sexual orientation and sexual practices fall under the osteopathic
principal of treating the whole patient.
Henry Ng, MD, MPH, is the
President of GLMA.
Back to Table of
Contents
Ongoing LGBT Health Disparities Addressed
by Affordable Care Act
This
April 2014 AAMC Reporter post details the benefits of the Affordable
Care Act (ACA) for LGBT people, including increased access to insurance,
provisions prioritizing cultural competence standards and training to improve
LGBT health outcome and increased data collection. Additionally, the ACA has
shifted more attention to how healthcare policy may contribute to negative
health outcomes for LGBT people, notes Henry Ng, MD, MPH.
Henry Ng,
MD, MPH, is the President of GLMA.
Trans
Bodies, Tran Selves to Be Released Soon
As described in this May 1, 2014, Washington Post article, a new resource for transgender
people is soon to be released. With 672 pages and “encyclopedic in scope,”
Trans Bodies, Trans Selves is positioned to be the go-to resource for
topics from health and law to history and politics. Reflecting on the book’s
predecessor for women, Our Bodies, Ourselves, editor, Laura
Erickson-Schroth, “At a time when over 90 percent of physicians were men ... it
was an extremely daring and exciting thing to publish a book in which women
taught other women about their bodies, their sexuality and their rights.” As the
article notes, the goal of the book is to empower transgender people and provide
them with a wealth of information about their lives.
Laura
Erickson-Schroth is a Member of GLMA’s Board of Directors.
Defense
Secretary Indicates Military Should Review Ban on Transgender Service
As reported by ABC News on May 11, 2014, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel
has indicated the ban on transgender individuals serving in the US military
"continually should be reviewed,” although not going so far as to indicate
whether he believes the policy should be overturned. Hagel also said, "Every
qualified American who wants to serve our country should have an opportunity if
they fit the qualifications and can do it."
HHS Expected to
Lift Medicare Ban on Gender-Affirming Surgery According to this May 8, 2014, Advocate article, the US Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is expected to lift Medicare’s 1981 ban on gender-affirming
surgeries, which claims the surgeries are “experimental” and denies any and all
requests for coverage. Advocates argue the 33 year old ban is based on outdated
science, which was reviewed by independent HHS panel formed last year.
Resource: SIECUS Releases New Edition of the State
Profiles For ten years,
SIECUS has “followed the money” to provide educators, advocates and policymakers
with an annual snapshot of how federal funding is impacting sexual health
education across the country. For the first time, the newly released
publication, SIECUS State Profiles: A Portrait of Sexuality Education and
Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Programs in the States, Fiscal Year 2012
Edition, also includes a State Profile At A Glance for each state,
providing an overview of adolescent sexual health education state policies, data
and federal funding. Click here to access the publication.
Resource:
LGBTQ Organizations Release Intimate Partner Violence Community Action Toolkits
The National Coalition of
Anti-Violence Programs (NCAVP) in association with GLAAD, the National Center
for Transgender Equality (NCTE), the National Black Justice Coalition (NBJC),
the Gay and Lesbian Taskforce and Trans People of Color Coalition (TPOCC)
announce the release of two community action toolkits that provide LGBTQ
communities, survivors of intimate partner violence and advocates working on
their behalf, resources to address intimate partner violence on the individual
and community level. The toolkits are focused specifically on intimate partner
violence in transgender and people of color communities and highlight the
adverse impact of intimate partner violence on transgender individuals and LGBTQ
people of color. Click here to learn more.
Back to Table of Contents
Conference: 5th Annual Infectious Diseases Update
Friday, June 13,
2014
1:00pm – 5:00pm
New York City, NY
This half-day course
consists of five lectures by leading experts from the fields of infectious
diseases. There will be ample time for audience participation and opportunities
to engage the speakers in dialogue about current controversies in HIV
management. This Weill Cornell CME activity is designed to lead to improved
patient care. The program will strive to: Summarize the advantages and
disadvantages of commonly used first line antiretroviral regimens, discuss three
new technologies available in the clinical microbiology laboratory, review the
epidemiology and diagnostic approach to malaria, summarize the approach to
managing HCV infection in 2014 and three teaching points related to outpatient
infectious disease cases. To register and learn more, click here.
GLMA’s LGBT Health Digest is an
electronic newsletter with information and resources for health professionals
concerned about the health of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT)
populations.
The Digest highlights issues, events, publications
and other newsworthy items pertinent to LGBT health. Please feel free to
circulate the Digest to your colleagues.
To sign up,
send your request to digest@glma.org. Also, to submit an item to be considered for
publication in the Digest, please send your request to Emily Kane-Lee
at ekanelee@glma.org
This is a resource for members of the LGBTIQ Community and allies. I hope that this helps others who are seeking resources and support that they have not found in their geographical community. This is a private blog and not affiliated with any organization or company. Be Sure to check back to the static pages, as I add new resources frequently. Here are some resources to help you.
Showing posts with label Lgbt Health Disparities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lgbt Health Disparities. Show all posts
Friday, May 23, 2014
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
'Everyone' Doesn't Always Mean Me
Liz Margolies, L.C.S.W.
Clinical psychotherapist; founder and executive director, National LGBT Cancer Network, Posted: 03/ 7/2012 8:06 pm
As the executive director of the National LGBT Cancer Network, my work is all about LGBT cancer survivors and those at risk. In the vast, multi-million dollar world of pink and teal ribbons, cancer organizations and foundations, we are nearly alone in this focus. I often interact with these mainstream groups, and when I do, I bring up the underserved and invisible LGBT community. "Oh, don't worry," they always say in that reassuring voice. "Our organization and our services are meant for everyone."
Really? In almost every instance, the flyer, the event, or the webpage for "everyone" doesn't include me.
If they write about cancer risks, there is no mention of the increased cancer risks of LGBT people. If they speak about screening or early detection, there is no mention of the additional difficulties LGBT people face, including discrimination and lower rates of health insurance. If they offer referrals for support groups, they rarely have one for LGBT survivors or caregivers. Most articles on of the impact of cancer treatment on sexuality assume that all of us are heterosexual. I am tired of feeling grateful for the information they do provide.
Let's try this test ourselves now. Imagine that I'm a lesbian whose partner was just diagnosed with lung cancer (remember that LGBT people use tobacco at nearly twice the national rate). I go to the Internet for information and support. Google's first suggestion is the National Lung Cancer Partnership. Their tag line is "Research, Awareness, Change." Sounds good so far. I click through to the website and type the word "lesbian" in the search box. What do I find? "No results matched your query." No, "everyone with lung cancer" does not include me.
Or let's imagine I am a transgender man looking to find a free, safe, and respectful place to receive a cervical pap smear. Let's also imagine that I don't live in one of the largest metropolitan centers in the country, but in, let's say, Clearwater, Fla. I go to Google and find the Florida Breast & Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. The opening paragraph tells me that they are free (good!), but I only qualify if I am a "woman." No, I am not welcome there. I suppose I could call and explain that, although I am not a woman, I have a cervix, but I fear the discomfort and discrimination I may face. No, "we provide pap smears for everyone who needs one" does not include me.
I know that there is an increasing number of organizations, facilities, and cancer websites that recognize the LGBT community. They show us that by including information we need, not by asking us to accept their one-size-fits-all approach. We need everyone to follow suit.
Last week, I met with a woman who wanted the National LGBT Cancer Network to distribute her articles on cancer survivorship. She said, "I don't specifically mention LGBT people in any of the pieces, but this information is of great benefit for everyone."
Really? She didn't understand that her information on the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, FMLA, is of limited value for LGBT people. FMLA is the federal law that requires that workers at large companies (with 50 employees or more) be granted unpaid, job-protected leave to recover from a serious health condition or to care for a seriously ill family member. But due to the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), LGBT workers cannot take paid and protected leave to care for domestic partners or same-sex spouses, even in states where they are legally married. So, no, I did not agree to distribute her articles.
As an LGBT person, my family is different, my support system is different, my access to care is different, and my welcome in your support groups is not guaranteed. If you don't know that and show me that you do, you are not including me. I will no longer be invisible and grateful.
Follow Liz Margolies, L.C.S.W. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/liz-margolies-lcsw/lgbt-cancer_b_1322293.html?ref=gay-voices
Reprinted at http://www.keystothecloset.blogspot.com
Clinical psychotherapist; founder and executive director, National LGBT Cancer Network, Posted: 03/ 7/2012 8:06 pm
As the executive director of the National LGBT Cancer Network, my work is all about LGBT cancer survivors and those at risk. In the vast, multi-million dollar world of pink and teal ribbons, cancer organizations and foundations, we are nearly alone in this focus. I often interact with these mainstream groups, and when I do, I bring up the underserved and invisible LGBT community. "Oh, don't worry," they always say in that reassuring voice. "Our organization and our services are meant for everyone."
Really? In almost every instance, the flyer, the event, or the webpage for "everyone" doesn't include me.
If they write about cancer risks, there is no mention of the increased cancer risks of LGBT people. If they speak about screening or early detection, there is no mention of the additional difficulties LGBT people face, including discrimination and lower rates of health insurance. If they offer referrals for support groups, they rarely have one for LGBT survivors or caregivers. Most articles on of the impact of cancer treatment on sexuality assume that all of us are heterosexual. I am tired of feeling grateful for the information they do provide.
Let's try this test ourselves now. Imagine that I'm a lesbian whose partner was just diagnosed with lung cancer (remember that LGBT people use tobacco at nearly twice the national rate). I go to the Internet for information and support. Google's first suggestion is the National Lung Cancer Partnership. Their tag line is "Research, Awareness, Change." Sounds good so far. I click through to the website and type the word "lesbian" in the search box. What do I find? "No results matched your query." No, "everyone with lung cancer" does not include me.
Or let's imagine I am a transgender man looking to find a free, safe, and respectful place to receive a cervical pap smear. Let's also imagine that I don't live in one of the largest metropolitan centers in the country, but in, let's say, Clearwater, Fla. I go to Google and find the Florida Breast & Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. The opening paragraph tells me that they are free (good!), but I only qualify if I am a "woman." No, I am not welcome there. I suppose I could call and explain that, although I am not a woman, I have a cervix, but I fear the discomfort and discrimination I may face. No, "we provide pap smears for everyone who needs one" does not include me.
I know that there is an increasing number of organizations, facilities, and cancer websites that recognize the LGBT community. They show us that by including information we need, not by asking us to accept their one-size-fits-all approach. We need everyone to follow suit.
Last week, I met with a woman who wanted the National LGBT Cancer Network to distribute her articles on cancer survivorship. She said, "I don't specifically mention LGBT people in any of the pieces, but this information is of great benefit for everyone."
Really? She didn't understand that her information on the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, FMLA, is of limited value for LGBT people. FMLA is the federal law that requires that workers at large companies (with 50 employees or more) be granted unpaid, job-protected leave to recover from a serious health condition or to care for a seriously ill family member. But due to the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), LGBT workers cannot take paid and protected leave to care for domestic partners or same-sex spouses, even in states where they are legally married. So, no, I did not agree to distribute her articles.
As an LGBT person, my family is different, my support system is different, my access to care is different, and my welcome in your support groups is not guaranteed. If you don't know that and show me that you do, you are not including me. I will no longer be invisible and grateful.
Follow Liz Margolies, L.C.S.W. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/liz-margolies-lcsw/lgbt-cancer_b_1322293.html?ref=gay-voices
Reprinted at http://www.keystothecloset.blogspot.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)